data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e9e3/6e9e3e43828a1301c5ad1679fd4a98d78d5dd814" alt=""
I was really surprised how some of the stereotypes were so deeply held. Some of the Lutherans were convinced that the Episcopalians had no regard for congregational singing, lay involvement or music. Worship, they worried, was done exclusively by the "professionals" and the congregation would be left to simply watch the show. Some of the Episcopalians were equally convinced that Lutheran worship would be like a tent revival, with no discernible liturgy whatsoever. So deeply held are some of these feelings that even after we began worshiping together one parishioner said, "I find all these hymns (assumed to be from the other church's hymnal) too different," when the reality was that all the hymns that day, with one exception, could be found in their hymnal!
In our situation, it is clear that the stereotypes and denominationalism people have expressed is simply an easy place for the anxiety of beginning to do something very new and different to leak out into the system. That I understand. What I wonder is if continuing to reinforce our denominational, tribal or team-type loyalties learned over the last five hundred years is the best way to proclaim the Gospel in the very different world in which we all now live? I wonder if we even consciously know we're doing it and I wonder if the vast majority of our neighbors, who aren't a part of any church, see our gentle jokes and funny stereotypes as we most often intend… as good natured ribbing or do they see them as something else? Are our "team" loyalties being seen by them simply as a healthy, humorous, thanksgiving for finding a church comfortable enough to call home, or are our "team" loyalties viewed by those on the outside as an arrogance that says, "we're #1" and, well, everyone else isn't?
No comments:
Post a Comment